« UK money trends continue gradual improvement | Main | Probability indicator signals end to recession this year »

UK inflation, gilt supply & other news

Posted on Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at 11:24AM by Registered CommenterSimon Ward | Comments2 Comments

Today's Financial Times draws attention to the huge deterioration in the UK's relative inflation performance caused by last year's plunge in the exchange rate, a topic discussed in an earlier post. Its observations, however, should be qualified in two respects.

First, the FT uses the CPI excluding indirect taxes as a gauge of "true" inflation, i.e. adjusting for the impact of December's VAT cut. This rose an annual 3.8% in April versus a 2.3% increase in the headline CPI. A better measure, however, is the CPI at constant tax rates (CPI-CT), which climbed by a smaller 3.4%.

Moreover, both of these alternative indices are based on the assumption that the VAT reduction was passed on in full – highly unlikely. Using a more realistic estimate of 50% pass-through, "true" inflation in April was 2.8-2.9% (i.e. halfway between the headline 2.3% and 3.4% CPI-CT increases).

Secondly, as discussed in a post last week, recent sterling strength – if sustained – promises a reduction in imported inflationary pressures later in 2009. The MPC's central-case forecast that the annual CPI increase will slow to 0.4% by the fourth quarter looks much too optimistic but the gap between UK and US / Eurozone inflation is peaking and should narrow significantly.

For the gilt market, supply is likely to represent a greater threat than relatively high UK inflation. The stock of gilts in market hands should shrink by about £50 billion over March-July, with Bank of England purchases of £120 billion offsetting net issuance of £70 billion. If the MPC were to suspend QE purchases from August, however, the market would need to absorb supply of £130-135 billion in the final eight months of 2009-10. (The DMO plans to issue a net £203 billion this fiscal year, based on the Treasury's forecast of public net borrowing of £175 billion.)

In other news today, minutes of this month's MPC meeting show that that some members favoured expanding QE by £75 billion rather than £50 billion, while the Committee discussed writing a letter to the Chancellor requesting an increase in the £150 billion limit "should economic conditions require it". This is likely to fuel expectations that gilt-buying will be extended beyond early August but such a decision will depend importantly on forthcoming monetary data (provisional April broad money numbers are released tomorrow).

Meanwhile, Inflation Report forecast tables show that the MPC expects annual average GDP changes of -4.0% in 2009, 1.1% in 2010 and 2.7% in 2011 in its central case based on market interest rate assumptions. However, its mean projections – taking into account a negative risk skew – are much weaker, at -4.2%, -0.2% and 1.6% respectively. This looks excessively gloomy – see last post.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Good morning Simon.Some of us feared that QE would lead to a bond bubble. Something similar occurred in Japan, even though BoJ focussed on purchasing securities directly from Banks and there was little seemingly direct impact on broad money (M2+CDs). Obviously the UK approach of buying gilts and bonds from the non-Bank sectors would imply that this could be more pronounced. The arithmetic suggests the gilt market is being held up by QE purchases and will crash when this eventually ceases (unless the 'independent BoE' actually carries on monetising these huge deficits for ever and a day).

- Do we have a gilt bubble? Or to what extent do you think the market is discounting the end of QE?

- To what extent do you believe QE is holding up the market in investment-grade bonds? There is little direct purchasing by BoE going on - a fraction of what was originally proposed...

May 21, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJonathan Purle

Thank you for your comments. On your second question, QE has probably had more impact on corporate bonds than the low level of Bank purchases would suggest, as cash injected via gilt-buying finds other homes. However, the rally appears mainly to have reflected global factors. It would be surprising if spreads widened significantly when QE ends.

It seems difficult to argue that QE has caused a gilt bubble – yields have reversed their initial decline remarkably quickly. To the extent that there was / is a bubble, it reflects excessive gloom on economic prospects and complacency on inflation, rather than QE. However, I share your concern that the market is not fully prepared for the scale of the coming swing from net official purchases to sales.

May 22, 2009 | Registered CommenterSimon Ward

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>