« Dovish MPC signals despite inflation risks | Main | Surveys turn grim - but are they distorted? »

Northern Rock: looking on the bright side

Posted on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 02:39PM by Registered CommenterSimon Ward | Comments3 Comments

Media comment has focused on the risks but the nationalisation of Northern Rock could prove extraordinarily profitable for UK taxpayers – assuming the government can avoid making a significant compensation payment to equity and subordinated debt holders.

Despite Treasury guarantees, Northern Rock has been forced to offer high interest rates to retain its retail deposit base, with savers concerned that their accounts would be frozen in the event of the bank going into administration. (Including a temporary loyalty bonus, Rock’s tracker online account currently pays a 6.99% AER.) Nationalisation removes this liquidity risk and should allow the bank to reduce its retail funding costs significantly.

European Union state aid requirements imply the Bank of England will continue to charge a penal interest rate on its loan but this now represents a transfer within the public sector.

On the assets side, the aim will be to shrink the mortgage book to allow early repayment of the Bank of England’s loan. New lending will be negligible and mortgage rates will be raised to encourage existing borrowers to refinance elsewhere. Assuming they stay, this will add to the boost to profitability from lower funding costs. Job losses are also inevitable, reducing the bank's cost base.

The key concern is that housing market weakness coupled with possible adverse incentive effects from public ownership will lead to significant default losses. Northern Rock had £97 billion of customer loans at 30 June 2007 but credit risk on £46 billion of the total had been partially transferred to holders of securitised notes.

In the housing recession of the early 1990s repossessions nationally reached a peak of 0.77% of outstanding mortgages in 1991. Assume Northern Rock is forced to foreclose on 1% of its loans each year for three years and achieves a recovery rate of only 70%. Based on a £97 billion book, this would imply a loss of £850-900 million, of which about £150 million might fall on holders of securitised notes. Northern Rock’s shareholder funds stood at £2.3 billion at 30 June 2007. Even assuming significant erosion since, the remaining equity in the business should easily absorb any losses barring an Armageddon scenario for the housing market.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

Simon, you say that "new lending will be negligible and mortgage rates will be raised to encourage existing borrowers to refinance elsewhere". Are you referring to borrowers on variable rate mortgages and borrowers you are coming to the end of fixed-rate deals? Or are borrowers who still have a few years to go on their fixed-rate mortgage deals likely to see their mortgage rates increased during the period of their fixed-rate deals?

February 21, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterHenry Smith

I am referring to any lending where Northern Rock has discretion to reset the terms. This would not include fixed-rate deals until their expiry but a large volume of such loans mature over the next 18 months.

February 21, 2008 | Registered CommenterSimon Ward

that means there's plenty of dosh to pay decent compo to shareholders who've had their asset confiscated by hmg.

March 2, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterr swipes

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>