« OECD leading indicators may signal global growth peak | Main | UK house prices still inexpensive relative to rents »

UK consumer recovery is soundly-based and welcome

Posted on Friday, November 1, 2013 at 10:28AM by Registered CommenterSimon Ward | CommentsPost a Comment

Having failed to predict the current economic upswing, the commentariat now decries the “wrong kind of growth”. A typical “argument”: consumer credit rose at an annualised rate of 6.0% in the latest three months, while average weekly earnings are up by only 0.7% over the past year; so consumers must now be “releveraging” to finance another spending splurge, even though debt is still at an unsustainable level.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Consumer credit accounts for only 9% of the stock of household sector borrowing from banks, which is dominated by mortgages. Total borrowing rose by 1.5% annualised over the last three months and is only 1.0% higher than a year ago.

This borrowing rise needs to be compared with total income growth, not the increase in average weekly earnings. Solid expansion in employee numbers coupled with stronger self-employment and entrepreneurial income resulted in non-property-related earnings rising by 4.1% in the year to the second quarter. Borrowing, therefore, continues to grow more slowly than income.

Total household debt was 141% of disposable income at the end of the second quarter versus a 2008 peak of 170% – see chart. A judgement about sustainability should take into account the burden of interest service and the value of assets. Interest payments were 5.6% of income in the second quarter, a low in data extending back to 1987. The interest burden would remain below its post-1987 average of 8.6% even if the average interest rate on debt rose by 2 percentage points. The ratio of debt to wealth, meanwhile, is likely to fall below its post-1987 average of 17.4% in 2013, reflecting house and share price gains and saving.

So borrowing isn’t surging, incomes are growing respectably and debt is consistent with servicing capacity and wealth.

A consumer splurge? The volume of spending in the second quarter was no higher than in the second quarter of 2007. Is six years of stagnation insufficient for the killjoys?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>