« Record fund-buying suggesting velocity rise | Main | Why the RBS / HBOS rescue loans stayed secret »

UK monetary backdrop still consistent with recovery

Posted on Monday, November 30, 2009 at 03:54PM by Registered CommenterSimon Ward | Comments2 Comments

The Bank of England's favoured broad money measure – M4 excluding money holdings of "intermediate other financial corporations" (i.e. companies classified as non-banks that act as a conduit for interbank business) – contracted by 0.7% in October following a 0.8% September decline. This suggests a serious monetary deficiency that threatens to abort an economic recovery.

On closer examination, however, these falls are entirely explained by a large drop in M4 held by other financial corporations (OFCs) not classified as "intermediate". By contrast, the combined money holdings of households and non-financial corporations – i.e. M4 excluding all OFCs – rose by 0.3% and 0.2% respectively in September and October, with annual growth reaching an eight-month high of 2.9%. This suggests that liquidity created by official gilt-buying is filtering down to "end-users" responsible for spending decisions.

The large fall in money holdings of "non-intermediate" OFCs, moreover, appears to be an artefact of the Bank of England's seasonal adjustment procedure. This grouping includes insurance companies and pension funds, investment and unit trusts, other fund managers and securities dealers. M4 holdings contracted by a seasonally-adjusted £29 billion, or 9%, in September and October (see Bankstats table A2.2.3, T6, column 4). Yet non-seasonally-adjusted figures show a decline of only £5 billion (derived by summing changes for the listed industries in table C1.1, T95-96). The £24 billion discrepancy accounts for the entire decline in M4 excluding intermediate OFCs in September and October.

An alternative approach is to use the non-seasonally-adjusted money holdings of "non-intermediate" OFCs when calculating the M4 measure. This is defensible on two grounds: it is unclear why these holdings should exhibit a seasonal pattern and there is insufficient history to estimate reliable monthly seasonal factors. On this basis, M4 excluding intermediate OFCs rose by 0.3% in October after a 0.2% September drop. While still weak, this is probably consistent with economic growth since the demand to hold broad money has been depressed by low deposit rates and reviving risk appetite.

Other features of the October monetary data support optimism about economic prospects. Narrow money M1 has accelerated strongly, rising at a 16% annualised rate over the last three months – see chart. Meanwhile, there were further rises in October in the corporate liquidity ratio (i.e. non-financial companies' sterling and foreign currency money holdings divided by their bank borrowing) and mortgage approvals for house purchase, to their highest levels since September 2007 and March 2008 respectively. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

This is a very late question, so I would not be at all surprised if it went unanswered.

But given how M4 is created whenever there is a loan, how is it possible for the M4 lending/M4 ratio to be substantially above 1?

I can understand how it can for the corporate sector: i.e. Company A gets a $100 loan from Bank B to invest. It spends $50 of the deposit created on an asset from non-corporate private sector. The seller of the asset acquires $50. M4 is still $100; corporate liquidity ratio is 0.5; non-corporate private sector now has $50 more. If that $50 does not return to the corporate sector, for some reason, then corporate liquidity suffers.

Is this an accurate description of how corporate liquidity can fall?

many thanks

January 11, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterGiles

Every loan creates an equivalent liability on the other side of the balance sheet but this will not necessarily be an M4 deposit. For example, if the company taking out the loan buys inputs from a foreign firm the cash may show up as a foreign deposit, not included in M4. Or, in your example, the seller of the asset may use the proceeds to buy newly-issued bank equity - this purchase would reduce M4 and thereby cancel out the increase due to the loan. M4 lending is higher than M4 currently because UK banks relied partly on foreign borrowing to fund the domestic credit boom of the last decade.

January 18, 2010 | Registered CommenterSimon Ward

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>