« Further US M2 pick-up in latest week | Main | Medium-term risks shifting from deflation to inflation »

Sterling slide no economic panacea

Posted on Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 04:20PM by Registered CommenterSimon Ward | Comments1 Comment

The 23% plunge in the effective exchange rate over the last 12 months is the largest annual fall since the pound was forced off the gold standard in 1931. The rate of decline is greater than during the 1976 IMF crisis and after sterling’s expulsion from the exchange rate mechanism in 1992 – see first chart.

Policy-makers and economists have cheered on the depreciation on the view that it will support activity at little inflation cost. This is based partly on the favourable aftermath of the ERM decline – growth rebounded in 1993 while inflation fell further. This recovery, however, reflected a revival in domestic demand in response to interest rate cuts – the monetary transmission mechanism was working – more than a boom in net exports. The economy was improving before exit from the ERM, having entered recession in 1990, and a huge negative “output gap” outweighed the inflationary impact of the lower exchange rate.

When the Thai baht collapsed in 1997, the boost to net exports was swamped by a contraction of money and credit as foreign capital fled the country. The UK is not Thailand but sterling’s plunge could accelerate a withdrawal of foreign funds from the banking system, exacerbating the credit crunch.

British banks’ net sterling borrowing from overseas stood at £113 billion in August 2007, just before the run on Northern Rock. Surprisingly, this increased over the subsequent 12 months, reaching £200 billion in August 2008 – so foreigners initially supplied more funds to struggling banks. The trend, however, may have turned: £37 billion was repaid in September and October combined and sterling’s plunge could accelerate withdrawals.

The consensus view that the lower currency carries little inflation risk may also be questioned. The second chart shows annual rates of change of manufactured import prices and the effective rate, the latter inverted. The relationship suggests import cost inflation will reach an annual 15-20% in early 2009. With manufactured imports accounting for 17% of domestic demand, this implies a 2.5-3.5% boost to economy-wide prices, excluding second-round effects. The “output gap” is widening rapidly but its impact should be smaller than in 1992-93 – it turned negative only in the third quarter, according to the OECD. Plunging commodity prices and the VAT cut will ensure significantly lower headline consumer price inflation in 2009 but the decline may fall short of MPC and consensus expectations.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

I'm sure you are right. I only hope those holding the monetary reins understand this.

A constant belated drip-feed of base-rate cuts, plus King's negative remarks (as mentioned here) almost seem designed to devalue Sterling as if that's a universally desirable outcome. From where I'm sitting I see that even for industry, when the devaluation is this drastic, there are disruptive factors counteracting the exporter benefits.

The BoE should settle on a bottom rate, which I personally don't believe should be much lower than 1.5%, and try to adopt a more Sterling-friendly outlook, while concentrating on interventions to improve liquidity without which the base rate level becomes more of a central bank positioning statement than a monetary tool.

January indicators will be telling, as many seem to forget that these will be the first to reflect the effects of the belated cut to 2%. Let's hope for the first green shoots.

December 19, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDavid P

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>