« US money weakness extending to household sector | Main | Global economic prospects still dimming »

Thoughts on US / Chinese yield curve signals

Posted on Friday, December 7, 2018 at 08:54AM by Registered CommenterSimon Ward | Comments5 Comments

Monetary trends and cycle analysis have been suggesting a cautious view of global economic and equity market prospects. An argument for remaining neutrally-positioned or overweight in equities and other risk assets at present runs as follows.

Major equity market declines historically were associated with US / global recessions. The US Treasury curve (10s-2s) inverted well before every recession since the mid 1950s but has yet to do so. The term premium, moreover, is unusually low, meaning that the flatness of the curve exaggerates monetary tightness. The curve, in other words, needs to become significantly negatively sloped to indicate a recession. Once this occurs, investors will have time to derisk portfolios before markets weaken.

This argument is dangerous for several reasons.

First, equity markets usually decline before / during economic slowdowns as well as recessions. Slowdown-related falls can often be severe, e.g. the 1966-67 US economic slowdown was associated with a 22% peak-to-trough decline in the S&P 500. Investors should dial down risk ahead of slowdowns as well as recessions, to the extent that either can be anticipated.

Secondly, the focus on the US yield curve may be misguided. The current global slowdown originated in China / Asia and has spilled over to Europe. The Chinese yield curve inverted in mid-2017 – see first chart.  It is possible that this will prove to have been the recession warning signal in this cycle, with the US curve lagging.

The last Asian-driven global economic slowdown was in 1997-98. It did not develop into a recession partly because of US / G7 monetary policy easing and partly because the region was a smaller part of the global economy. Asia ex Japan now accounts for 37% of world GDP at purchasing power parity, up from 19% in 1997, according to the IMF.

Thirdly, monetary trends argue against the view that the yield curve signal has been distorted by a low term premium. The slope of the G7 curve has been closely correlated historically with the six-month rate of change of G7 real narrow money – second chart. The two measures are giving an identical message at present – both suggest restrictive monetary conditions. If the term premium had introduced a distortion, one would expect real money growth to be diverging positively from the curve (assuming, reasonably, that the premium has little impact on money trends).

Fourthly, the argument that investors have time to adjust their portfolios after a yield curve inversion may be correct in principle but the relevant curve now may be China’s. The MSCI All Country World Index peaked in January 2018, eight months after the Chinese inversion.

The normalisation of the Chinese curve since mid-2017 suggests that China / Asia will lead a global economic recovery but Chinese money trends currently remain weak, arguing that any revival is unlikely until the second half of 2019 at the earliest.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

Just to confirm, in your second chart, you’re showing G7 narrow money vs. the US yield curve?

December 8, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterViresh Kanabar

Really appreciate these insights.
Thank you

December 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterEmma Wilkinson

Hi Simon, interesting reasoning as always but according to my bloomberg data the Chinese yield curve has never inverted over the last couple of years.



December 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterJan Leroy

Thank you Simon - do you have any further thoughts on when and to what extent the investment cycle downturn will impact on global growth?

December 10, 2018 | Unregistered CommenterGuy Warner

Viresh - no, the curve is also G7 (GDP-weighted average).

Jan - the data are from Refinitiv.

Guy - the cycle analysis suggests that the yoy change in G7 business investment has peaked and will turn significantly negative by 2020.

December 11, 2018 | Registered CommenterSimon Ward

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>